PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PINC.TO (Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund) and ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PINC.TO is a fund fund, while ZAG.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, PINC.TO returned 9.86%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ZAG.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINC.TO achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's 1.70% return.

PINC.TO

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 3.84%
• YTD: 13.51%
• 6M: 14.39%
• 1Y: 23.27%
• 3Y*: 15.92%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: —

ZAG.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 1.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	13.51%	14.41%	17.01%	5.89%	-8.44%	26.14%	2.90%	14.28%	-6.43%
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF	1.70%	2.25%	4.48%	6.41%	-11.60%	-2.60%	8.34%	6.84%	2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PINC.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2018	0.11

The correlation between PINC.TO and ZAG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PINC.TO	ZAG.TO
Financial Services	28.9%	-
Energy	22.1%	-
Real Estate	21.3%	0.0%
Utilities	17.4%	-
Communication Services	6.0%	-
Healthcare	1.3%	-
Industrials	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-
Technology	0.3%	-

Return for Risk

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINC.TO

PINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

ZAG.TO

ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 21
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PINC.TO	ZAG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	0.67	+2.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	0.94	+4.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.12	+0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.52	1.06	+5.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.97	2.48	+22.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINC.TO and ZAG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PINC.TO	ZAG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	0.67	+2.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	0.12	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.45	+0.17

Drawdowns

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.84%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINC.TO and ZAG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINC.TO	ZAG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.84%	-18.03%	-25.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.59%	-2.79%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.38%	-5.42%	-3.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.59%	-15.77%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-1.09%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.40%	-3.54%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.19%	-0.26%

Volatility

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) at 1.68%. This indicates that PINC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PINC.TO	ZAG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.86%	1.68%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.03%	3.43%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.48%	4.45%	+2.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.58%	6.58%	+2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.90%	7.11%	+7.79%

Dividends

PINC.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison

PINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than ZAG.TO's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	4.54%	5.05%	10.05%	10.60%	9.99%	8.17%	7.34%	5.06%	3.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF	3.42%	3.48%	3.44%	3.47%	3.56%	3.04%	2.88%	3.03%	2.92%	2.95%	3.07%	3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PINC.TO and ZAG.TO in my portfolio?

PINC.TO and ZAG.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.