PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINC.TO achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly lower than BANK.TO's 32.36% return.


PINC.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
1.74%
6M
17.22%
YTD
18.40%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.09%

BANK.TO

1D
1.19%
1M
4.39%
6M
32.36%
YTD
32.36%
1Y
66.60%
3Y*
35.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$7.04MCA$7.06MCA$6.05M
CA$10.04KCA$9.73KCA$12.47K

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PINC.TO
Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund
18.40%14.41%11.54%0.95%-11.57%
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund
32.36%41.00%27.90%16.23%-20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PINC.TO and BANK.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINC.TO
PINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BANK.TO
BANK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PINC.TOBANK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.93

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.87

8.09

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.66

35.40

-8.73

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is comparable to the BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINC.TO and BANK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.84%, which is greater than BANK.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINC.TO and BANK.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINC.TOBANK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.84%

-29.03%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.59%

-8.27%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.48%

-15.49%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.41%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-8.53%

+2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.89%

-0.96%

Volatility

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) is 1.54%, while Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that PINC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BANK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINC.TOBANK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

4.75%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

11.18%

-6.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.35%

12.98%

-6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.38%

15.64%

-7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

15.64%

-0.94%

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINC.TO has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BANK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PINC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Dividend Comparison

PINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than BANK.TO's 11.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund
11.86%13.73%15.28%13.60%10.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PINC.TO
Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund
4.37%5.05%5.48%5.78%5.51%4.60%5.33%5.06%3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINC.TO and BANK.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BANK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BANK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PINC.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PINC.TO and 0.60% for BANK.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINC.TO and BANK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer