PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIMSX vs. AQMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIMSX vs. AQMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I (PIMSX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I (AQMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIMSX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than AQMIX's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PIMSX has underperformed AQMIX with an annualized return of 2.99%, while AQMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.33% annualized return.


PIMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.44%
6M
0.81%
YTD
1.42%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
2.82%
10Y*
2.99%
ALL TIME*
3.77%

AQMIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.13%
6M
5.39%
YTD
10.24%
1Y
23.61%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
4.33%
ALL TIME*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PIMSX vs. AQMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIMSX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I
1.42%6.08%5.90%7.16%-5.52%0.20%4.58%6.40%-0.53%3.93%
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I
10.24%14.62%8.13%2.08%35.47%-1.04%-0.43%1.92%-8.88%-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PIMSX and AQMIX is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

-0.10

The correlation between PIMSX and AQMIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (5 years) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIMSX vs. AQMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIMSX
PIMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PIMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PIMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AQMIX
AQMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AQMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIMSX vs. AQMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I (PIMSX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I (AQMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIMSXAQMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.39

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

4.20

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

14.43

-1.43

PIMSX vs. AQMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the AQMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIMSX and AQMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIMSX vs. AQMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIMSX drawdown since its inception was -18.10%, smaller than the maximum AQMIX drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIMSX and AQMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIMSXAQMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.10%

-26.52%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.30%

-5.14%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.30%

-13.57%

+12.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.06%

-13.57%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.69%

-22.17%

+11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-3.12%

+2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-9.93%

+8.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

1.49%

-1.16%

Volatility

PIMSX vs. AQMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I (PIMSX) is 0.54%, while AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I (AQMIX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that PIMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AQMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIMSXAQMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

3.39%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

7.39%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40%

9.57%

-7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.73%

11.60%

-8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.72%

10.26%

-7.54%

PIMSX vs. AQMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIMSX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AQMIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIMSX vs. AQMIX - Dividend Comparison

PIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than AQMIX's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I
2.05%2.26%3.83%8.39%12.76%6.94%5.31%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.51%
PIMSX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I
4.28%4.77%4.60%3.66%2.77%1.89%2.92%3.18%3.16%3.23%3.16%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIMSX and AQMIX have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AQMIX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to PIMSX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIMSX dropped -18.10% vs AQMIX's -26.52%.

AQMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIMSX and AQMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer