PIMIX vs. LFLIX
PIMIX (PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class) and LFLIX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PIMIX returned 3.49%/yr vs 2.34%/yr for LFLIX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIMIX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LFLIX.
Performance
PIMIX vs. LFLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIMIX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than LFLIX's 3.03% return.
PIMIX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
LFLIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
PIMIX vs. LFLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIMIX PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class | 0.72% | 11.08% | 5.45% | 9.36% | -9.07% | 2.62% | 5.84% | 8.10% | 0.63% | 8.63% |
LFLIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund | 3.03% | 8.82% | 2.95% | 9.57% | -10.87% | 1.05% | 15.00% | 10.84% | -2.07% | 4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIMIX and LFLIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.65 |
The correlation between PIMIX and LFLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIMIX vs. LFLIX — Risk / Return Rank
PIMIX
LFLIX
PIMIX vs. LFLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIMIX | LFLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.06 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 10.56 | -3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIMIX vs. LFLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIMIX drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum LFLIX drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIMIX and LFLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIMIX | LFLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -16.73% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.69% | -2.72% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.84% | -7.54% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.34% | -16.73% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.52% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -2.85% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 0.79% | +0.30% |
Volatility
PIMIX vs. LFLIX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX) have volatilities of 1.34% and 1.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIMIX | LFLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 1.30% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.41% | 3.47% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.19% | 4.13% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 5.74% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 5.09% | -0.83% |
PIMIX vs. LFLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIMIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than LFLIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIMIX vs. LFLIX - Dividend Comparison
PIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than LFLIX's 6.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFLIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund | 6.93% | 6.67% | 8.94% | 5.36% | 3.28% | 2.90% | 3.62% | 6.04% | 3.67% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIMIX PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class | 5.85% | 6.01% | 6.27% | 6.21% | 4.98% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 5.83% | 5.66% | 5.37% | 5.52% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIMIX and LFLIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIMIX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to LFLIX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIMIX dropped -13.39% vs LFLIX's -16.73%.
LFLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIMIX and LFLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer