PIGIX vs. CNX1.L
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund (PIGIX) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L).
PIGIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 28, 2000. CNX1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010.
Performance
PIGIX vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PIGIX vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIGIX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund | -1.18% | 8.52% | 3.28% | 7.97% | -16.67% | -1.03% | 7.53% | 14.75% | -1.99% | 7.96% |
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -5.29% | 19.98% | 26.37% | 55.50% | -33.49% | 28.32% | 47.63% | 38.99% | -1.30% | 31.56% |
Different Trading Currencies
PIGIX is traded in USD, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIGIX achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly higher than CNX1.L's -5.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PIGIX has underperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of 2.91%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.74% annualized return.
PIGIX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- 3.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.91%
CNX1.L
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- YTD
- -5.29%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PIGIX vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIGIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PIGIX vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank
PIGIX
CNX1.L
PIGIX vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund (PIGIX) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIGIX | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.23 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.82 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.12 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 7.74 | -3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIGIX | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.23 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.63 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.95 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.98 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PIGIX and CNX1.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PIGIX vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
PIGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, while CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIGIX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund | 4.45% | 4.69% | 4.37% | 3.48% | 3.37% | 4.50% | 3.81% | 3.93% | 4.22% | 4.47% | 3.91% | 6.70% |
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PIGIX vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIGIX drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum CNX1.L drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGIX and CNX1.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIGIX | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.09% | -27.56% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -11.03% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.09% | -27.56% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.09% | -27.56% | +4.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -8.21% | +5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -4.61% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 3.68% | -2.49% |
Volatility
PIGIX vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund (PIGIX) is 2.25%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that PIGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PIGIX | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 5.71% | -3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | 11.91% | -8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.16% | 19.90% | -14.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.38% | 20.57% | -14.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 19.88% | -14.10% |