PIGIX vs. ACWL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund (PIGIX) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L).
PIGIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 28, 2000. ACWL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 8, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PIGIX or ACWL.L.
Correlation
The correlation between PIGIX and ACWL.L is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PIGIX vs. ACWL.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PIGIX:
1.40
ACWL.L:
0.15
PIGIX:
2.07
ACWL.L:
0.30
PIGIX:
1.25
ACWL.L:
1.04
PIGIX:
0.57
ACWL.L:
0.12
PIGIX:
4.39
ACWL.L:
0.49
PIGIX:
1.81%
ACWL.L:
4.51%
PIGIX:
5.67%
ACWL.L:
14.58%
PIGIX:
-22.95%
ACWL.L:
-18.21%
PIGIX:
-6.51%
ACWL.L:
-12.29%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIGIX achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than ACWL.L's -8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PIGIX has underperformed ACWL.L with an annualized return of 2.22%, while ACWL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 29.06% annualized return.
PIGIX
2.17%
0.16%
1.77%
8.56%
0.59%
2.22%
ACWL.L
-8.04%
-6.02%
-5.06%
4.08%
21.17%
29.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PIGIX vs. ACWL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIGIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PIGIX vs. ACWL.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PIGIX
ACWL.L
PIGIX vs. ACWL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund (PIGIX) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PIGIX vs. ACWL.L - Dividend Comparison
PIGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, while ACWL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIGIX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund | 4.45% | 4.36% | 3.82% | 4.06% | 3.67% | 3.42% | 3.94% | 4.06% | 3.71% | 3.92% | 5.02% | 3.91% |
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PIGIX vs. ACWL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIGIX drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, which is greater than ACWL.L's maximum drawdown of -18.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGIX and ACWL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PIGIX vs. ACWL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund (PIGIX) is 2.62%, while Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that PIGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.