PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIGFX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PIGFX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund (PIGFX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PIGFX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIGFX
Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund
-9.23%14.20%17.46%32.80%-20.79%23.80%27.20%33.88%-0.64%22.58%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIGFX achieves a -9.23% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PIGFX has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 12.92%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


PIGFX

1D
3.07%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
-9.23%
6M
-8.09%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
12.92%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIGFX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIGFX
PIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIGFX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund (PIGFX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIGFX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.45

0.92

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

1.41

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.21

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.41

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.13

6.61

-4.48

PIGFX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIGFX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIGFX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

0.92

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.61

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.68

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.46

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between PIGFX and ^GSPC is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

PIGFX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIGFX drawdown since its inception was -44.04%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGFX and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PIGFX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.04%

-56.78%

+12.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.55%

-12.14%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.12%

-25.43%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.47%

-33.92%

+2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.69%

-5.78%

-5.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.40%

-10.75%

+4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

2.60%

+1.93%

Volatility

PIGFX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund (PIGFX) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that PIGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PIGFX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

5.37%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

9.55%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

18.33%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.70%

16.90%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

18.05%

+0.80%