PIGFX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PIGFX (Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PIGFX returned 14.88%/yr vs 18.01%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PIGFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

PIGFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund (PIGFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIGFX achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PIGFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 14.88%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.01% annualized return.

PIGFX

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 14.30%
• 3Y*: 16.48%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: 14.88%

FCNTX

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 7.74%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 14.58%
• 10Y*: 18.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIGFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PIGFX Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund	3.43%	14.20%	17.46%	32.80%	-20.79%	23.80%	27.20%	33.88%	-0.64%	22.58%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	8.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PIGFX and FCNTX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2002	0.92

The correlation between PIGFX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PIGFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIGFX

PIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 14
PIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
PIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
PIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIGFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund (PIGFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIGFX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.61	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	2.22	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.29	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	2.14	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	8.97	-5.45

PIGFX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIGFX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PIGFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIGFX drawdown since its inception was -44.04%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGFX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIGFX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.04%	-49.19%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.32%	-11.30%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.99%	-19.75%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.12%	-32.59%	+5.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.47%	-32.59%	+1.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-2.59%	+0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	-8.15%	+1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	2.69%	+1.65%

Volatility

PIGFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund (PIGFX) is 5.23%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that PIGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIGFX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	6.33%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.64%	11.87%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.71%	15.10%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.81%	19.32%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.96%	19.76%	-0.80%

PIGFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIGFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIGFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

PIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.55%, more than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.30%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
PIGFX Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund	18.55%	19.18%	5.75%	3.41%	4.39%	20.14%	9.08%	5.43%	6.07%	4.66%	2.19%	4.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIGFX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

PIGFX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIGFX or FCNTX?

FCNTX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to PIGFX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIGFX dropped -44.04% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.