PIGDX vs. FISZX
PIGDX (Federated Hermes International Growth Fund) and FISZX (Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PIGDX returned -24.69%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for FISZX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PIGDX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FISZX.
Performance
PIGDX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIGDX achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 20.57% return.
PIGDX
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- -73.43%
- 3Y*
- -31.63%
- 5Y*
- -24.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.31%
FISZX
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 12.37%
- YTD
- 20.57%
- 1Y
- 36.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PIGDX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIGDX Federated Hermes International Growth Fund | 10.51% | -72.44% | 6.47% | 8.80% | -29.43% | 6.85% | 43.18% | 9.57% |
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund | 20.57% | 31.77% | 3.61% | 15.83% | -28.32% | 9.91% | 23.49% | 13.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIGDX and FISZX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PIGDX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIGDX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank
PIGDX
FISZX
PIGDX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIGDX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.64 | 1.28 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 2.39 | -3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 8.11 | -9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIGDX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIGDX drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGDX and FISZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIGDX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.94% | -39.92% | -40.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.87% | -14.48% | -64.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.87% | -14.63% | -64.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.94% | -39.92% | -40.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.31% | -9.06% | -68.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -12.20% | -5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.49% | 4.26% | +53.23% |
Volatility
PIGDX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) is 6.88%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that PIGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIGDX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 7.93% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | 20.56% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.30% | 22.62% | +59.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.27% | 18.72% | +20.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.87% | 18.73% | +12.14% |
PIGDX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIGDX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIGDX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison
PIGDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FISZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund | 1.60% | 1.92% | 2.55% | 1.89% | 1.37% | 6.08% | 0.90% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIGDX Federated Hermes International Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 2.03% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 4.64% | 16.19% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIGDX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FISZX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to PIGDX (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIGDX dropped -79.94% vs FISZX's -39.92%.
FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIGDX and FISZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer