PIGDX vs. FHLFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PIGDX (Federated Hermes International Growth Fund) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PIGDX returned -22.87%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PIGDX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.

Performance

PIGDX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIGDX achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 9.53% return.

PIGDX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 19.23%
• 6M: -72.71%
• 1Y: -71.12%
• 3Y*: -29.26%
• 5Y*: -22.87%
• 10Y*: —

FHLFX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 22.51%
• 3Y*: 17.18%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIGDX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PIGDX Federated Hermes International Growth Fund	19.23%	-72.44%	6.47%	8.80%	-29.43%	6.85%	43.18%	26.99%	-16.25%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	9.53%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	11.23%	8.09%	21.66%	-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PIGDX and FHLFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.84

The correlation between PIGDX and FHLFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PIGDX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIGDX

PIGDX Risk / Return Rank: 0
PIGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PIGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PIGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
PIGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
PIGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIGDX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PIGDX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	1.47	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.73	2.10	-2.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.65	1.27	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	1.91	-2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	7.17	-8.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PIGDX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIGDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIGDX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PIGDX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.91	1.47	-2.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.60	0.56	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	0.53	-0.68

Drawdowns

PIGDX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIGDX drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGDX and FHLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIGDX	FHLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.94%	-33.58%	-46.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.87%	-11.37%	-67.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.87%	-13.62%	-65.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.94%	-29.36%	-50.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.52%	-0.42%	-75.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.08%	-6.11%	-10.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.05%	3.03%	+46.02%

Volatility

PIGDX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.64%. This indicates that PIGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIGDX	FHLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	4.64%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	147.00%	12.08%	+134.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.92%	14.83%	+67.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.05%	15.98%	+23.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.96%	17.64%	+13.32%

PIGDX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIGDX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIGDX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

PIGDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.16%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%	0.00%
PIGDX Federated Hermes International Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	1.98%	1.24%	2.03%	3.98%	4.51%	4.64%	16.19%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIGDX and FHLFX in my portfolio?

PIGDX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIGDX or FHLFX?

PIGDX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FHLFX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIGDX dropped -79.94% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.