PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PID.TO (Purpose International Dividend Fund) and FCIM.NEO (Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. PID.TO is actively managed, while FCIM.NEO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PID.TO returned 14.46%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for FCIM.NEO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PID.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FCIM.NEO.

Performance

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO) and Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PID.TO achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly lower than FCIM.NEO's 17.96% return.

PID.TO

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 2.96%
• 6M: 12.68%
• YTD: 14.90%
• 1Y: 28.81%
• 3Y*: 21.82%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: 10.45%
• ALL TIME*: 9.12%

FCIM.NEO

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -4.08%
• 6M: 9.54%
• YTD: 17.96%
• 1Y: 31.44%
• 3Y*: 28.81%
• 5Y*: 16.78%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF	CA$2.39M	CA$2.17M	CA$2.26M
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	CA$137.95K	CA$141.14K	CA$191.06K

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	14.90%	33.43%	13.85%	15.75%	-2.67%	7.76%	5.24%
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF	17.96%	37.03%	25.38%	16.54%	-12.40%	10.86%	18.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PID.TO and FCIM.NEO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020	0.55

The correlation between PID.TO and FCIM.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PID.TO

PID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
PID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FCIM.NEO

FCIM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 71
FCIM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FCIM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCIM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FCIM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FCIM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO) and Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PID.TO	FCIM.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.59	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.41	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	2.39	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.08	8.55	+1.53

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PID.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FCIM.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PID.TO and FCIM.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PID.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FCIM.NEO drawdown of -26.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID.TO and FCIM.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PID.TO	FCIM.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.27%	-26.89%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-13.21%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.35%	-13.21%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.07%	-26.89%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-7.47%	+6.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-5.39%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	3.69%	-0.82%

Volatility

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO) is 3.82%, while Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that PID.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PID.TO	FCIM.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	7.10%	-3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.12%	17.78%	-5.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	19.87%	-5.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.46%	17.64%	-5.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.79%	16.98%	-3.19%

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PID.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FCIM.NEO's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PID.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Dividend Comparison

PID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than FCIM.NEO's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF	1.35%	1.59%	1.26%	1.70%	1.86%	2.70%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	2.75%	3.12%	4.02%	4.39%	4.86%	4.50%	4.64%	4.28%	4.67%	3.53%	3.49%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PID.TO and FCIM.NEO in my portfolio?

PID.TO and FCIM.NEO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PID.TO or FCIM.NEO?

On fees, FCIM.NEO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PID.TO or FCIM.NEO?

FCIM.NEO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PID.TO.

What is the main difference between PID.TO and FCIM.NEO?

They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PID.TO and 0.45% for FCIM.NEO.