PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PICK vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PICK vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 16.18% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 67.84% return. Over the past 10 years, PICK has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 14.91%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 32.19% annualized return.


PICK

1D
-0.68%
1M
2.44%
6M
2.29%
YTD
16.18%
1Y
58.79%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
14.91%
ALL TIME*
5.11%

SOXX

1D
0.07%
1M
-10.85%
6M
45.95%
YTD
67.84%
1Y
113.81%
3Y*
42.35%
5Y*
28.10%
10Y*
32.19%
ALL TIME*
13.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.34M$45.18M$51.90M
$6.04B$5.84B$5.80B

PICK vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
16.18%51.89%-16.37%9.69%2.54%22.61%27.46%16.47%-18.65%38.42%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
67.84%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PICK and SOXX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.51

The correlation between PICK and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PICK vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PICK
SOXX

Basic Materials

97.1%

-

Industrials

1.2%

-

Technology

0.8%
100.0%

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

PICK
97.1%
SOXX

-

Industrials

PICK
1.2%
SOXX

-

Technology

PICK
0.8%
SOXX
100.0%

Energy

PICK
0.5%
SOXX

-

Financial Services

PICK
0.1%
SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

PICK
0.1%
SOXX

-

Communication Services

PICK

-

SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

PICK

-

SOXX

-

Healthcare

PICK

-

SOXX

-

Real Estate

PICK

-

SOXX

-

Utilities

PICK

-

SOXX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PICK vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PICK
PICK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PICK vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PICKSOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.86

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

16.24

-8.14

PICK vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PICK Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PICK and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PICK vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PICKSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.87%

-70.21%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

-29.01%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.52%

-41.36%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.37%

-45.75%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.72%

-45.75%

-6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.47%

-22.92%

+9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.99%

-19.92%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

6.88%

+0.29%

Volatility

PICK vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) is 8.26%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 17.83%. This indicates that PICK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PICKSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

17.83%

-9.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.71%

38.92%

-12.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.29%

44.48%

-14.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.11%

38.24%

-10.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.29%

34.54%

-6.25%

PICK vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

PICK vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SOXX's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
2.23%2.88%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.29%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PICK and SOXX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (17.83%) compared to PICK (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICK dropped -68.87% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 32.19% vs 14.91% for PICK. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, PICK has been the lower-risk option at 8.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 32.19% return vs 14.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.

PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.29% for SOXX.

PICK is categorized as Metals, while SOXX is Semiconductors. PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PICK and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer