PICB vs. MILK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PICB (Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF) and MILK (Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - PICB tracks the S&P International Corporate Bond Index while MILK tracks the Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PICB returned 0.28% vs 7.66% for MILK. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PICB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MILK.

Performance

PICB vs. MILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PICB achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than MILK's 2.49% return.

PICB

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.21%
• YTD: -1.94%
• 6M: -2.10%
• 1Y: 0.28%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: -2.25%
• 10Y*: 0.92%

MILK

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 2.49%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 7.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PICB vs. MILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PICB Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF	-1.94%	14.33%	-1.74%
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	2.49%	7.49%	-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PICB and MILK is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024	0.52

The correlation between PICB and MILK shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PICB vs. MILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PICB

PICB Risk / Return Rank: 9
PICB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PICB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PICB Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PICB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
PICB Martin Ratio Rank: 9

MILK

MILK Risk / Return Rank: 46
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PICB vs. MILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PICB	MILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	1.50	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	2.17	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.27	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	2.05	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.11	7.38	-7.27

PICB vs. MILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PICB Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the MILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PICB and MILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PICB vs. MILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PICB drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, which is greater than MILK's maximum drawdown of -6.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICB and MILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	PICB	MILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.10%	-6.16%	-30.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-3.75%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.99%	-0.23%	-12.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.67%	-1.13%	-8.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	1.04%	+1.43%

Volatility

PICB vs. MILK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) has a higher volatility of 2.18% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) at 1.26%. This indicates that PICB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PICB	MILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.18%	1.26%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.20%	3.80%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.87%	5.15%	+2.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.18%	6.69%	+3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.98%	6.69%	+3.29%

PICB vs. MILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PICB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MILK's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PICB vs. MILK - Dividend Comparison

PICB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than MILK's 7.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	7.02%	6.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PICB Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF	3.42%	3.17%	3.19%	2.24%	1.64%	1.34%	1.22%	1.42%	1.70%	1.47%	2.20%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PICB and MILK in my portfolio?

PICB and MILK have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PICB or MILK?

PICB has higher volatility (2.18%) compared to MILK (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICB dropped -37.10% vs MILK's -6.16%.

Which ETF is better, PICB or MILK?

On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 7.66% vs 0.28% for PICB. On fees, MILK is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MILK has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PICB or MILK?

Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 0.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PICB or MILK?

MILK is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PICB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PICB or MILK?

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 3.42% for PICB.

What is the main difference between PICB and MILK?

PICB tracks S&P International Corporate Bond Index, while MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PICB and 0.49% for MILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.