PIAMX vs. FFRHX
PIAMX (PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PIAMX returned 4.14%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for FFRHX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIAMX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.
Performance
PIAMX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIAMX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 2.05% return.
PIAMX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- —
FFRHX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.95%
PIAMX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund | 0.79% | 2.34% | 11.23% | 16.38% | -10.93% | 7.82% | 9.05% | 11.77% | -2.63% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 2.05% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 5.01% | 1.69% | 8.63% | -0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIAMX and FFRHX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PIAMX and FFRHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIAMX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank
PIAMX
FFRHX
PIAMX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIAMX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.96 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 5.16 | -4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 18.28 | -14.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIAMX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.62 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.92 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
PIAMX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIAMX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIAMX and FFRHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIAMX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -22.20% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.75% | -1.19% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | -3.29% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.92% | -5.90% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.11% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -1.15% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 0.34% | +0.91% |
Volatility
PIAMX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.61%. This indicates that PIAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIAMX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.61% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 1.62% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12% | 2.35% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 2.88% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.23% | 4.14% | +0.09% |
PIAMX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIAMX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIAMX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison
PIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than FFRHX's 7.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.07% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund | 7.90% | 9.12% | 8.49% | 8.12% | 7.99% | 8.64% | 6.63% | 6.96% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIAMX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIAMX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to FFRHX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIAMX dropped -18.15% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.
FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIAMX and FFRHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer