PIAMX vs. BSL
PIAMX (PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund) and BSL (Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PIAMX returned 3.94%/yr vs 4.00%/yr for BSL. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PIAMX charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BSL.
Performance
PIAMX vs. BSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIAMX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than BSL's -0.14% return.
PIAMX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.12%
BSL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $498.00K | $451.34K | $475.25K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PIAMX vs. BSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund | 1.27% | 2.34% | 11.23% | 16.38% | -10.93% | 7.82% | 9.05% | 11.77% | -2.63% |
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund | -0.14% | 2.15% | 18.16% | 20.03% | -22.88% | 28.33% | -4.44% | 14.06% | -7.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIAMX and BSL is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIAMX vs. BSL — Risk / Return Rank
PIAMX
BSL
PIAMX vs. BSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) and Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIAMX | BSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | -0.10 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | -0.23 | +1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIAMX vs. BSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIAMX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum BSL drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIAMX and BSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIAMX | BSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -43.83% | +25.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.75% | -7.86% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | -7.86% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.92% | -24.48% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -2.59% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -7.31% | +5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 3.45% | -2.19% |
Volatility
PIAMX vs. BSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) is 0.64%, while Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that PIAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIAMX | BSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 1.06% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 5.05% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18% | 6.50% | -3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 10.43% | -6.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 16.34% | -12.13% |
PIAMX vs. BSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIAMX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BSL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIAMX vs. BSL - Dividend Comparison
PIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, less than BSL's 8.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund | 8.27% | 8.45% | 9.46% | 10.76% | 6.89% | 5.75% | 7.65% | 8.15% | 9.21% | 5.93% | 5.86% | 7.27% |
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund | 7.08% | 9.12% | 8.49% | 8.12% | 7.99% | 8.64% | 6.63% | 6.96% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIAMX and BSL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSL has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to PIAMX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIAMX dropped -18.15% vs BSL's -43.83%.
PIAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIAMX and BSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer