PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYZX vs. PJFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYZX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYZX achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than PJFAX's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYZX has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 6.03%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.29% annualized return.


PHYZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.80%
6M
2.29%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
6.03%

PJFAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
7.66%
YTD
9.23%
6M
7.87%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
20.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYZX vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYZX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z
1.80%9.04%8.37%12.23%-12.31%5.83%7.73%16.14%-1.25%7.79%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
9.23%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%36.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYZX and PJFAX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1996

0.26

The correlation between PHYZX and PJFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYZX vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYZX
PHYZX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PHYZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYZX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYZXPJFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.24

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.24

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

3.95

+10.11

PHYZX vs. PJFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYZX and PJFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYZXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.35

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.62

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

0.85

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.52

+0.69

Drawdowns

PHYZX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYZX drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYZX and PJFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYZXPJFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-64.07%

+35.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-17.76%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-24.05%

+20.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.09%

-43.56%

+27.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.09%

-43.56%

+22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.63%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-20.35%

+17.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

5.55%

-4.99%

Volatility

PHYZX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX) is 1.23%, while PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that PHYZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYZXPJFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

3.85%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

12.34%

-9.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56%

16.27%

-12.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

24.70%

-19.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

24.01%

-18.47%

PHYZX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYZX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYZX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison

PHYZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, less than PJFAX's 12.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHYZX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z
6.98%6.95%7.37%7.00%6.15%6.08%8.35%6.21%6.55%6.25%6.36%6.93%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.28%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYZX and PJFAX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJFAX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to PHYZX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYZX dropped -28.57% vs PJFAX's -64.07%.

PHYZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYZX and PJFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer