PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYPX vs. XILSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYPX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYPX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 7.97% return.


PHYPX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.44%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
8.67%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
5.33%

XILSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.97%
6M
10.49%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYPX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYPX
PACE High Yield Investments
1.82%7.86%8.08%12.77%-11.38%3.64%7.22%12.38%-2.88%6.14%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
7.97%18.70%18.93%18.65%1.23%-1.10%7.37%2.60%-2.11%-8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYPX and XILSX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYPX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYPX
PHYPX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PHYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XILSX
XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYPX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYPXXILSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

8.17

-6.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

81.24

-78.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

43.21

-41.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

117.99

-115.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.41

805.46

-800.05

PHYPX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYPX and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYPXXILSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

8.17

-6.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

3.29

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

1.63

-0.52

Drawdowns

PHYPX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYPX drawdown since its inception was -27.27%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYPX and XILSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYPXXILSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-14.53%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.40%

-0.21%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.32%

-2.36%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.16%

-6.27%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-4.91%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.03%

+1.44%

Volatility

PHYPX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that PHYPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYPXXILSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.43%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

2.11%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01%

3.08%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.69%

3.77%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

3.93%

+1.19%

PHYPX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYPX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYPX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

PHYPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHYPX
PACE High Yield Investments
6.26%6.18%6.34%6.15%5.77%5.97%5.33%5.72%6.15%5.54%5.75%6.02%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
8.81%9.51%13.06%12.82%2.68%2.04%5.20%6.63%6.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYPX and XILSX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYPX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYPX dropped -27.27% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYPX and XILSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer