PHTNX vs. FRKMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX).
PHTNX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014. FRKMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.
Performance
PHTNX vs. FRKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHTNX vs. FRKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund | -2.64% | 14.41% | 11.06% | 14.92% | -16.76% | 13.88% | 14.74% | 6.81% |
FRKMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K | -0.48% | 9.91% | 4.40% | 8.17% | -11.57% | 2.88% | 8.68% | 3.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHTNX achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than FRKMX's -0.48% return.
PHTNX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
FRKMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHTNX vs. FRKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHTNX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FRKMX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PHTNX vs. FRKMX — Risk / Return Rank
PHTNX
FRKMX
PHTNX vs. FRKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHTNX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.59 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 2.20 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.13 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 8.58 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHTNX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.59 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.48 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.69 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHTNX and FRKMX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PHTNX vs. FRKMX - Dividend Comparison
PHTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than FRKMX's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund | 4.74% | 4.62% | 3.71% | 3.42% | 8.05% | 5.40% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 3.79% | 2.52% | 2.28% | 1.68% |
FRKMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K | 3.27% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 2.92% | 4.66% | 3.65% | 2.56% | 1.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PHTNX vs. FRKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHTNX drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, which is greater than FRKMX's maximum drawdown of -16.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTNX and FRKMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHTNX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -16.04% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -3.42% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -16.04% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -3.17% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -3.64% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 0.85% | +0.74% |
Volatility
PHTNX vs. FRKMX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX) at 1.96%. This indicates that PHTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHTNX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 1.96% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 2.86% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.04% | 4.58% | +5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 5.22% | +5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.20% | 5.13% | +6.07% |