PHTMX vs. PMTIX
PHTMX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2015 Fund) and PMTIX (Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Principal. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PHTMX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for PMTIX.
Performance
PHTMX vs. PMTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PHTMX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMTIX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
PHTMX vs. PMTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTMX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2015 Fund | 4.29% | 11.23% | 7.87% | 11.09% | -13.61% | 7.83% | 11.84% | 15.18% | -4.52% | 11.78% |
PMTIX Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund | 5.32% | 13.25% | 12.86% | 15.11% | -16.81% | 12.70% | 14.71% | 22.40% | -7.45% | 18.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHTMX and PMTIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014 | 0.96 |
The correlation between PHTMX and PMTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHTMX vs. PMTIX — Risk / Return Rank
PHTMX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PMTIX
PHTMX vs. PMTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2015 Fund (PHTMX) and Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHTMX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHTMX vs. PMTIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHTMX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -52.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.66% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.76% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.36% | — |
Volatility
PHTMX vs. PMTIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHTMX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 8.16% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 10.63% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 11.15% | — |
PHTMX vs. PMTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHTMX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PMTIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PHTMX vs. PMTIX - Dividend Comparison
PHTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than PMTIX's 9.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTMX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2015 Fund | 5.36% | 4.41% | 3.87% | 3.45% | 5.20% | 5.53% | 4.89% | 3.11% | 2.24% | 2.33% | 2.00% | 1.61% |
PMTIX Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund | 9.20% | 9.69% | 9.60% | 4.26% | 10.05% | 8.87% | 6.37% | 6.49% | 8.21% | 5.87% | 3.97% | 9.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PHTMX and PMTIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for PHTMX and PMTIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer