PHTJX vs. URFFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PHTJX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PHTJX returned 9.21%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for URFFX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. PHTJX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.

Performance

PHTJX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTJX achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTJX has underperformed URFFX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while URFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.

PHTJX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 4.67%
• YTD: 6.89%
• 1Y: 15.56%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 6.88%
• 10Y*: 9.21%
• ALL TIME*: 8.68%

URFFX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 9.62%
• YTD: 13.05%
• 1Y: 24.29%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 10.12%
• ALL TIME*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PHTJX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund	6.89%	15.57%	12.67%	16.45%	-17.37%	15.57%	15.13%	22.69%	-8.00%	18.13%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	13.05%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	20.16%	-9.01%	19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTJX and URFFX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014	0.96

The correlation between PHTJX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PHTJX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PHTJX

PHTJX Risk / Return Rank: 65
PHTJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PHTJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PHTJX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PHTJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PHTJX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 83
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PHTJX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PHTJX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.91	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.69	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	2.87	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.57	12.30	-2.74

PHTJX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTJX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PHTJX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTJX drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTJX and URFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHTJX	URFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.17%	-44.25%	+17.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-7.89%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.58%	-14.14%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.12%	-23.76%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.17%	-29.97%	+2.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-0.17%	-0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-5.88%	+1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	1.84%	-0.33%

Volatility

PHTJX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) is 2.59%, while USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that PHTJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHTJX	URFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	2.93%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.89%	9.82%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.51%	11.86%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.88%	13.97%	-2.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.47%	14.33%	-1.86%

PHTJX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTJX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHTJX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

PHTJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than URFFX's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund	4.38%	4.68%	4.09%	3.37%	8.44%	4.96%	3.98%	3.71%	4.01%	2.31%	1.99%	1.67%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.72%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHTJX and URFFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, PHTJX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PHTJX or URFFX?

URFFX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to PHTJX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTJX dropped -27.17% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.