PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSZX vs. PJFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSZX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund (PHSZX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSZX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than PJFAX's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSZX has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 12.49%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.36% annualized return.


PHSZX

1D
-1.85%
1M
3.22%
YTD
-1.53%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
12.49%

PJFAX

1D
0.73%
1M
8.22%
YTD
9.93%
6M
8.66%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
29.55%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
20.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSZX vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHSZX
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund
-1.53%19.73%23.04%12.50%-10.06%6.09%41.72%18.62%-3.77%31.41%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
9.93%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%36.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSZX and PJFAX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1999

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between PHSZX and PJFAX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSZX vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSZX
PHSZX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PHSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSZX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund (PHSZX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHSZXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.47

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

2.03

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.35

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.30

4.32

+2.98

PHSZX vs. PJFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSZX and PJFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHSZXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.47

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.61

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.85

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.52

+0.13

Drawdowns

PHSZX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSZX drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSZX and PJFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSZXPJFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-64.07%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-17.76%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-24.05%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-43.56%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.92%

-43.56%

+12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

0.00%

-4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-20.35%

+10.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

5.55%

-1.48%

Volatility

PHSZX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund (PHSZX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) at 3.73%. This indicates that PHSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSZXPJFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

3.73%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

12.33%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

16.29%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.82%

24.69%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

24.01%

-0.87%

PHSZX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHSZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHSZX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison

PHSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.10%, less than PJFAX's 12.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHSZX
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund
11.10%10.93%23.93%4.26%1.48%29.82%20.26%2.92%11.21%4.43%3.44%13.45%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.20%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSZX and PJFAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHSZX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to PJFAX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSZX dropped -42.77% vs PJFAX's -64.07%.

PHSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSZX and PJFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer