PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSZX vs. LYFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSZX vs. LYFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund (PHSZX) and AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSZX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than LYFIX's 2.58% return.


PHSZX

1D
-1.85%
1M
3.22%
YTD
-1.53%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
12.49%

LYFIX

1D
-1.87%
1M
3.29%
YTD
2.58%
6M
4.59%
1Y
37.64%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSZX vs. LYFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PHSZX
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund
-1.53%19.73%23.04%12.50%-10.06%6.09%41.72%1.98%
LYFIX
AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund
2.58%28.22%-0.27%7.19%-0.92%-3.42%54.83%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSZX and LYFIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2019

0.77

The correlation between PHSZX and LYFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (5 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSZX vs. LYFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSZX
PHSZX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PHSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LYFIX
LYFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LYFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LYFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSZX vs. LYFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund (PHSZX) and AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHSZXLYFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

2.15

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

3.02

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

4.51

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.30

16.66

-9.35

PHSZX vs. LYFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the LYFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSZX and LYFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHSZXLYFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.15

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.25

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.52

+0.12

Drawdowns

PHSZX vs. LYFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSZX drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than LYFIX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSZX and LYFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSZXLYFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-35.33%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-8.49%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-24.22%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-32.45%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-1.92%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-9.87%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

2.30%

+1.77%

Volatility

PHSZX vs. LYFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund (PHSZX) is 5.15%, while AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that PHSZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSZXLYFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

5.84%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

14.23%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

17.80%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.82%

22.83%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

23.38%

-0.24%

PHSZX vs. LYFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHSZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than LYFIX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHSZX vs. LYFIX - Dividend Comparison

PHSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.10%, more than LYFIX's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYFIX
AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund
1.74%1.78%2.24%2.63%4.43%12.88%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHSZX
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund
11.10%10.93%23.93%4.26%1.48%29.82%20.26%2.92%11.21%4.43%3.44%13.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSZX and LYFIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYFIX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to PHSZX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSZX dropped -42.77% vs LYFIX's -35.33%.

LYFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSZX and LYFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer