PHSWX vs. QLENX
PHSWX (Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund) and QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity N) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, PHSWX returned 3.80%/yr vs 21.63%/yr for QLENX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHSWX charges 0.01%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for QLENX.
Performance
PHSWX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSWX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's 0.29% return.
PHSWX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 14.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
QLENX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 15.75%
- 3Y*
- 27.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
PHSWX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSWX Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund | 7.19% | 22.65% | 1.35% | 1.80% | -12.69% | 3.47% |
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N | 0.29% | 34.07% | 30.18% | 23.67% | 18.92% | 29.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSWX and QLENX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2021 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHSWX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank
PHSWX
QLENX
PHSWX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund (PHSWX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHSWX | QLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.40 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 2.62 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 8.18 | -5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHSWX | QLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 2.21 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 2.16 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.22 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
PHSWX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSWX drawdown since its inception was -94.47%, which is greater than QLENX's maximum drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSWX and QLENX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSWX | QLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.47% | -38.50% | -55.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.06% | -6.09% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.47% | -7.09% | -87.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.47% | -17.19% | -77.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.93% | -0.34% | -92.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -7.48% | -21.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 1.95% | +3.17% |
Volatility
PHSWX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison
Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund (PHSWX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) at 2.21%. This indicates that PHSWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHSWX | QLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 2.21% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 5.60% | +7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 7.27% | +8.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 754.83% | 10.08% | +744.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 725.68% | 10.59% | +715.09% |
PHSWX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSWX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than QLENX's 5.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHSWX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison
PHSWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than QLENX's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSWX Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund | 0.45% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 2.04% | 2.24% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N | 1.63% | 1.64% | 7.13% | 21.21% | 14.09% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 6.09% | 8.91% | 2.87% | 4.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHSWX and QLENX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHSWX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to QLENX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSWX dropped -94.47% vs QLENX's -38.50%.
QLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHSWX and QLENX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer