PHSWX vs. BGX
PHSWX (Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund) and BGX (Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, PHSWX returned 3.80%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for BGX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHSWX charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for BGX.
Performance
PHSWX vs. BGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSWX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than BGX's -4.34% return.
PHSWX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 14.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
BGX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- -4.34%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- -2.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.31%
PHSWX vs. BGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSWX Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund | 7.19% | 22.65% | 1.35% | 1.80% | -12.69% | 3.47% |
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund | -4.34% | 2.09% | 19.83% | 18.92% | -20.57% | 17.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSWX and BGX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2021 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHSWX vs. BGX — Risk / Return Rank
PHSWX
BGX
PHSWX vs. BGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund (PHSWX) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHSWX | BGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | -0.33 | +1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | -0.42 | +1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.95 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.21 | +1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | -0.45 | +3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHSWX | BGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | -0.33 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.29 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.28 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
PHSWX vs. BGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSWX drawdown since its inception was -94.47%, which is greater than BGX's maximum drawdown of -47.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSWX and BGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSWX | BGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.47% | -47.40% | -47.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.06% | -12.43% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.47% | -14.08% | -80.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.47% | -25.94% | -68.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.93% | -8.00% | -84.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -6.99% | -22.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 5.88% | -0.76% |
Volatility
PHSWX vs. BGX - Volatility Comparison
Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund (PHSWX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) at 1.41%. This indicates that PHSWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHSWX | BGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 1.41% | +3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 5.95% | +7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 7.98% | +7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 754.83% | 11.79% | +743.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 725.68% | 17.54% | +708.14% |
PHSWX vs. BGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSWX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BGX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHSWX vs. BGX - Dividend Comparison
PHSWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than BGX's 9.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund | 9.04% | 8.87% | 9.89% | 11.71% | 8.15% | 7.01% | 8.76% | 9.35% | 11.74% | 7.12% | 9.01% | 8.72% |
PHSWX Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund | 0.45% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 2.04% | 2.24% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHSWX and BGX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHSWX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to BGX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSWX dropped -94.47% vs BGX's -47.40%.
PHSWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHSWX and BGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer