PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSP.L vs. USFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PHSP.L is traded in GBp, while USFR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USFR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSP.L achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than USFR.L's 1.96% return.


PHSP.L

1D
-3.07%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
2.49%
6M
23.74%
1Y
113.09%
3Y*
41.45%
5Y*
22.12%
10Y*
16.53%

USFR.L

1D
0.30%
1M
1.61%
YTD
1.96%
6M
1.38%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
2.15%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
2.49%129.68%22.85%-6.51%15.50%-12.11%40.85%16.79%
USFR.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD
1.96%-3.29%7.25%-0.31%14.18%0.79%-2.38%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSP.L and USFR.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2019

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSP.L
PHSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR.L
USFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
USFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHSP.LUSFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.13

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

0.93

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

2.50

+3.90

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the USFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSP.L and USFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHSP.LUSFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

0.72

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.55

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.29

+0.09

Drawdowns

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSP.L drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than USFR.L's maximum drawdown of -18.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSP.L and USFR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSP.LUSFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-18.16%

-51.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.75%

-5.09%

-33.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.75%

-9.80%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.75%

-15.70%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.02%

-5.94%

-28.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.07%

-8.93%

-31.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.60%

1.91%

+15.69%

Volatility

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a higher volatility of 16.44% compared to WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) at 1.93%. This indicates that PHSP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSP.LUSFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.44%

1.93%

+14.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.39%

5.05%

+46.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.02%

6.64%

+47.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.99%

8.60%

+24.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.25%

8.90%

+20.35%

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHSP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHSP.L vs. USFR.L - Dividend Comparison

PHSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USFR.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD
3.99%4.32%5.24%4.58%0.78%0.00%0.57%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSP.L and USFR.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USFR.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USFR.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PHSP.L.

PHSP.L is categorized as Silver, while USFR.L is Government Bonds. PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while USFR.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PHSP.L and 0.15% for USFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSP.L and USFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer