PHSKX vs. VIMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX).
PHSKX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Dec 31, 1975. VIMCX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jun 22, 2009.
Performance
PHSKX vs. VIMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHSKX vs. VIMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -16.98% | -3.58% | 7.43% | 22.00% | -33.46% | 1.23% | 63.29% | 44.03% | 7.44% | 33.54% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | -6.62% | 0.72% | 5.20% | 22.64% | -19.75% | 25.28% | 26.11% | 31.74% | -4.18% | 24.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSKX achieves a -16.98% return, which is significantly lower than VIMCX's -6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSKX has underperformed VIMCX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while VIMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.08% annualized return.
PHSKX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -12.64%
- YTD
- -16.98%
- 6M
- -21.04%
- 1Y
- -12.53%
- 3Y*
- -0.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
VIMCX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -10.94%
- YTD
- -6.62%
- 6M
- -8.91%
- 1Y
- -2.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHSKX vs. VIMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSKX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VIMCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PHSKX vs. VIMCX — Risk / Return Rank
PHSKX
VIMCX
PHSKX vs. VIMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHSKX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | -0.10 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | -0.01 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.00 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | -0.30 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.91 | -0.87 | -1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHSKX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | -0.10 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.17 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.54 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.70 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSKX and VIMCX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PHSKX vs. VIMCX - Dividend Comparison
PHSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.82%, more than VIMCX's 4.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 55.82% | 46.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.10% | 0.62% | 2.19% | 6.10% | 1.60% | 1.54% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 4.73% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 0.23% | 1.58% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
PHSKX vs. VIMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSKX drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, which is greater than VIMCX's maximum drawdown of -33.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSKX and VIMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSKX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.79% | -33.92% | -47.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.77% | -12.25% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -28.42% | -18.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.87% | -33.92% | -12.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.21% | -12.71% | -25.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.38% | -4.87% | -24.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 4.22% | +3.33% |
Volatility
PHSKX vs. VIMCX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) at 4.93%. This indicates that PHSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHSKX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 4.93% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.98% | 11.34% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 19.71% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.76% | 18.00% | +6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 18.62% | +4.81% |