PHSKX vs. MXMGX
PHSKX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and MXMGX (Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PHSKX returned 10.31%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for MXMGX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PHSKX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for MXMGX.
Performance
PHSKX vs. MXMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSKX achieves a -4.10% return, which is significantly lower than MXMGX's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSKX has outperformed MXMGX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while MXMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.
PHSKX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- -8.04%
- 3Y*
- 0.29%
- 5Y*
- -4.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.92%
MXMGX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PHSKX vs. MXMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -4.10% | -3.58% | 7.43% | 22.00% | -33.46% | 1.23% | 63.29% | 44.03% | 7.44% | 33.54% |
MXMGX Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund | 2.39% | 2.99% | 9.02% | 19.61% | -22.82% | 15.25% | 23.65% | 31.28% | -2.80% | 23.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSKX and MXMGX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1997 | 0.86 |
The correlation between PHSKX and MXMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHSKX vs. MXMGX — Risk / Return Rank
PHSKX
MXMGX
PHSKX vs. MXMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHSKX | MXMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.05 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 0.32 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 1.07 | -2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHSKX vs. MXMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSKX drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, which is greater than MXMGX's maximum drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSKX and MXMGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSKX | MXMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.79% | -60.97% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.77% | -10.29% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -23.17% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -32.33% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.87% | -35.88% | -10.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.62% | -2.15% | -26.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.38% | -11.74% | -17.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.15% | 3.09% | +8.06% |
Volatility
PHSKX vs. MXMGX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) at 2.53%. This indicates that PHSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHSKX | MXMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 2.53% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.43% | 10.53% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 13.59% | +6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.91% | 19.05% | +5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 18.89% | +4.66% |
PHSKX vs. MXMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSKX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMGX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHSKX vs. MXMGX - Dividend Comparison
PHSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.32%, more than MXMGX's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXMGX Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund | 1.64% | 1.68% | 3.66% | 2.39% | 2.66% | 4.92% | 2.74% | 2.19% | 6.13% | 4.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 48.32% | 46.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.10% | 0.62% | 2.19% | 6.10% | 1.60% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHSKX and MXMGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHSKX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to MXMGX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSKX dropped -81.79% vs MXMGX's -60.97%.
MXMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHSKX and MXMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer