PHSKX vs. EDF
PHSKX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and EDF (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund) are both mutual funds - PHSKX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus, while EDF is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, PHSKX returned 10.37%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for EDF. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHSKX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for EDF.
Performance
PHSKX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSKX achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's 17.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSKX has outperformed EDF with an annualized return of 10.37%, while EDF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.
PHSKX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- 6M
- -6.98%
- YTD
- -4.48%
- 1Y
- -8.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.02%
- 5Y*
- -4.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
EDF
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 18.91%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
PHSKX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -4.48% | -3.58% | 7.43% | 22.00% | -33.46% | 1.23% | 63.29% | 44.03% | 7.44% | 33.54% |
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 17.95% | 22.24% | 25.54% | 21.63% | -27.96% | -8.47% | -31.14% | 45.06% | -18.24% | 24.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSKX and EDF is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2010 | 0.30 |
The correlation between PHSKX and EDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHSKX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank
PHSKX
EDF
PHSKX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHSKX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.28 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 2.55 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 9.64 | -10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHSKX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSKX drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, which is greater than EDF's maximum drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSKX and EDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSKX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.79% | -64.23% | -17.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.77% | -9.44% | -14.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -24.32% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -52.47% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.87% | -64.23% | +17.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.91% | -3.37% | -25.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.38% | -21.35% | -8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.76% | 2.49% | +8.27% |
Volatility
PHSKX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) at 5.61%. This indicates that PHSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHSKX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.61% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.66% | 12.45% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 15.16% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 25.75% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 30.70% | -7.16% |
PHSKX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSKX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHSKX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison
PHSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.52%, more than EDF's 13.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 13.31% | 14.49% | 15.32% | 16.71% | 17.31% | 12.91% | 16.46% | 15.67% | 19.37% | 13.58% | 14.75% | 17.93% |
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 48.52% | 46.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.10% | 0.62% | 2.19% | 6.10% | 1.60% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHSKX and EDF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHSKX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to EDF (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSKX dropped -81.79% vs EDF's -64.23%.
EDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHSKX and EDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer