PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHEQ vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHEQ vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHEQ achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly higher than XAPR's 3.39% return.


PHEQ

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.64%
YTD
5.67%
6M
6.14%
1Y
15.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHEQ vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PHEQ and XAPR is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.76

The correlation between PHEQ and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHEQ vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHEQ
PHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHEQ vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHEQXAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

2.06

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

13.37

-9.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.21

70.60

-53.39

PHEQ vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHEQ and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHEQXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

4.31

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.80

1.88

-0.08

Drawdowns

PHEQ vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.55%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHEQ and XAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHEQXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.55%

-6.18%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-0.66%

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.16%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-0.18%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.12%

+0.81%

Volatility

PHEQ vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.75%. This indicates that PHEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHEQXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

0.75%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.56%

1.31%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16%

2.05%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.62%

6.18%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

6.18%

+2.44%

PHEQ vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHEQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHEQ vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

PHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
PHEQ
Parametric Hedged Equity ETF
1.03%1.19%1.39%1.73%
XAPR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHEQ and XAPR have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHEQ has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to XAPR (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHEQ dropped -12.55% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, PHEQ leads with 15.97% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, PHEQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PHEQ has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHEQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

PHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

They also come from different issuers: Parametric and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PHEQ and 0.85% for XAPR.

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHEQ and XAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer