PHDG vs. SCHD
PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHDG is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHDG returned 7.32%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for SCHD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHDG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
PHDG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHDG achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PHDG has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.32%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.
PHDG
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
PHDG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 15.43% | 2.72% | 10.95% | 8.18% | -14.09% | 15.67% | 18.97% | 8.57% | -2.44% | 15.89% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.82% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHDG and SCHD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2012 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PHDG and SCHD has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PHDG vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHDG
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
PHDG
SCHD
Financial Services
PHDG
SCHD
Communication Services
PHDG
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
PHDG
SCHD
Healthcare
PHDG
SCHD
Industrials
PHDG
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
PHDG
SCHD
Energy
PHDG
SCHD
Utilities
PHDG
SCHD
Real Estate
PHDG
SCHD
-
Basic Materials
PHDG
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHDG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
PHDG
SCHD
PHDG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHDG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.47 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.65 | 6.26 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.46 | 15.38 | +13.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHDG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | 2.64 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.77 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.86 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
PHDG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHDG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.70% | -33.37% | +15.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -4.61% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.78% | -16.13% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.06% | -16.85% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.06% | -33.37% | +16.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.73% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -3.32% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.87% | -0.92% |
Volatility
PHDG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.69%. This indicates that PHDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHDG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 2.69% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 7.65% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.91% | 10.95% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 14.38% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.93% | 16.71% | -4.78% |
PHDG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHDG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 1.84% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHDG and SCHD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHDG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to SCHD (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHDG dropped -17.70% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.79% vs 7.32% for PHDG. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PHDG.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.84% for PHDG.
PHDG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SCHD is Dividend. PHDG tracks S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.06% for SCHD.
PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHDG and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer