PHDG vs. RFLR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) and RFLR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. PHDG is passively managed, while RFLR is actively managed. Over the past year, PHDG returned 26.83% vs 27.92% for RFLR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHDG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RFLR.

Performance

PHDG vs. RFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHDG achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than RFLR's 9.61% return.

PHDG

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: 5.27%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 13.92%
• 1Y: 26.83%
• 3Y*: 11.64%
• 5Y*: 5.75%
• 10Y*: 7.32%

RFLR

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 9.95%
• 1Y: 27.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHDG vs. RFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	15.43%	2.72%	-0.56%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	9.61%	11.81%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PHDG and RFLR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.44

PHDG vs. RFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PHDG	RFLR
Technology	35.1%	16.3%
Financial Services	11.9%	17.0%
Communication Services	11.0%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.7%
Healthcare	8.7%	15.4%
Industrials	8.3%	14.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	2.5%
Energy	3.6%	6.2%
Utilities	2.4%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	6.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.3%

Return for Risk

PHDG vs. RFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHDG

PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 92
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 94

RFLR

RFLR Risk / Return Rank: 77
RFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHDG vs. RFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHDG	RFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	2.28	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.47	3.26	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.40	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.65	4.85	+2.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.46	17.08	+11.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHDG vs. RFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHDG Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the RFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHDG and RFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHDG	RFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03	2.28	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	1.16	-0.62

Drawdowns

PHDG vs. RFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than RFLR's maximum drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and RFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHDG	RFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.70%	-15.48%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.52%	-5.79%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-3.84%	-2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.64%	-0.69%

Volatility

PHDG vs. RFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) is 3.19%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that PHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHDG	RFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	3.80%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.77%	8.45%	-1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.91%	12.30%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.94%	12.23%	-1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.93%	12.23%	-0.30%

PHDG vs. RFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHDG vs. RFLR - Dividend Comparison

PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than RFLR's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	1.84%	2.10%	1.94%	1.93%	1.35%	0.44%	0.63%	1.80%	1.56%	1.83%	2.29%	1.64%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	0.61%	0.67%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHDG and RFLR in my portfolio?

PHDG and RFLR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHDG or RFLR?

RFLR has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to PHDG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHDG dropped -17.70% vs RFLR's -15.48%.

Which ETF is better, PHDG or RFLR?

On 1-year performance, RFLR leads with 27.92% vs 26.83% for PHDG. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PHDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PHDG or RFLR?

Over the 1-year period, RFLR has performed better with a 27.92% return vs 26.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PHDG or RFLR?

PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PHDG or RFLR?

PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.61% for RFLR.

What is the main difference between PHDG and RFLR?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.89% for RFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.