PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHDG vs. HECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHDG vs. HECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHDG achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than HECO's 75.21% return.


PHDG

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
10.56%
6M
10.62%
1Y
21.44%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
7.12%

HECO

1D
0.39%
1M
14.43%
YTD
75.21%
6M
65.97%
1Y
136.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHDG vs. HECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
10.56%2.72%1.56%
HECO
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
75.21%26.23%28.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PHDG and HECO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHDG vs. HECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHDG
PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

HECO
HECO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HECO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HECO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHDG vs. HECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHDGHECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

6.55

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.30

18.72

-1.42

PHDG vs. HECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the HECO Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHDG and HECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHDG vs. HECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, smaller than the maximum HECO drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and HECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHDGHECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.70%

-44.59%

+26.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-21.03%

+15.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

0.00%

-5.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-11.56%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

7.35%

-6.11%

Volatility

PHDG vs. HECO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) is 7.74%, while State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that PHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHDGHECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

10.31%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

29.00%

-19.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

37.52%

-26.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.40%

44.71%

-33.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.15%

44.71%

-32.56%

PHDG vs. HECO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HECO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHDG vs. HECO - Dividend Comparison

PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HECO
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
0.00%0.00%2.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
2.28%2.10%1.94%1.93%1.35%0.44%0.63%1.80%1.56%1.83%2.29%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHDG and HECO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HECO has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to PHDG (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHDG dropped -17.70% vs HECO's -44.59%.

On 1-year performance, HECO leads with 136.94% vs 21.44% for PHDG. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PHDG has been the lower-risk option at 7.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HECO has performed better with a 136.94% return vs 21.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.

PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.

PHDG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HECO is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.90% for HECO.

HECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHDG and HECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer