PHDG vs. ADME
PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) and ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds - PHDG tracks the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index while ADME tracks the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHDG returned 7.28%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for ADME. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PHDG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ADME.
Performance
PHDG vs. ADME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHDG achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly higher than ADME's 7.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PHDG has underperformed ADME with an annualized return of 7.28%, while ADME has yielded a comparatively higher 8.52% annualized return.
PHDG
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.48%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.61%
ADME
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $772.09K | $556.48K | $715.52K | |
| $1.18M | $678.43K | $904.25K |
PHDG vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 10.21% | 2.72% | 10.95% | 8.18% | -14.09% | 15.67% | 18.97% | 8.57% | -2.44% | 15.89% |
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 7.79% | 10.28% | 22.11% | 15.42% | -21.80% | 20.24% | 18.21% | 9.31% | -6.05% | 17.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHDG and ADME is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PHDG and ADME shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHDG vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank
PHDG
ADME
PHDG vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHDG | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.79 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 6.77 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHDG vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, smaller than the maximum ADME drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and ADME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHDG | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.70% | -27.49% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -7.49% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.78% | -15.67% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.06% | -23.43% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.06% | -27.49% | +10.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -2.55% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -7.83% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 1.98% | +0.22% |
Volatility
PHDG vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) is 2.51%, while Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that PHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHDG | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 3.24% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 8.87% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 11.07% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 13.03% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 14.45% | -2.34% |
PHDG vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ADME's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHDG vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison
PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than ADME's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% | 0.00% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 1.68% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHDG and ADME have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADME has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to PHDG (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHDG dropped -17.70% vs ADME's -27.49%.
On 10-year performance, ADME leads with 8.52% vs 7.28% for PHDG. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PHDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ADME has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 7.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.
PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.36% for ADME.
PHDG tracks S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, while ADME tracks Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.79% for ADME.
PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHDG and ADME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer