PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHAU.AS vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHAU.AS vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC (PHAU.AS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PHAU.AS is traded in EUR, while XLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHAU.AS achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PHAU.AS has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 12.91%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.


PHAU.AS

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
4.61%
6M
6.21%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
27.67%
5Y*
19.40%
10Y*
12.91%

XLV

1D
2.93%
1M
5.36%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
14.18%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHAU.AS vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHAU.AS
WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC
4.61%45.53%34.03%9.32%5.55%3.63%13.51%20.41%2.85%-1.37%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.23%0.92%9.24%-0.99%3.99%35.46%3.96%23.17%11.27%6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PHAU.AS and XLV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2007

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHAU.AS vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHAU.AS
PHAU.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PHAU.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHAU.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHAU.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PHAU.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHAU.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHAU.AS vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC (PHAU.AS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHAU.ASXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.31

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

3.26

+1.17

PHAU.AS vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHAU.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHAU.AS and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHAU.ASXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

0.95

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.48

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.53

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.60

+0.06

Drawdowns

PHAU.AS vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHAU.AS drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHAU.AS and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHAU.ASXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.19%

-31.02%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-10.87%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-22.26%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.74%

-22.26%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.59%

-27.38%

+8.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.26%

-6.79%

-8.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-6.48%

-5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

4.36%

+2.30%

Volatility

PHAU.AS vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC (PHAU.AS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) have volatilities of 5.17% and 5.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHAU.ASXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

5.36%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

10.94%

+9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

15.00%

+8.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

15.11%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.29%

17.33%

-3.04%

PHAU.AS vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHAU.AS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHAU.AS vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

PHAU.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHAU.AS
WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.65%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHAU.AS and XLV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PHAU.AS.

PHAU.AS is categorized as Gold, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. PHAU.AS tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHAU.AS and 0.08% for XLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHAU.AS and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer