PH vs. TMUS
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) are both stocks. PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.62%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 25.62%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively lower 16.24% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 32.73%
- 3Y*
- 35.16%
- 5Y*
- 27.15%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.92%
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- -2.66%
- 1Y
- -12.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 16.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.39%
PH vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 8.62% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -2.66% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and TMUS is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.32 |
The correlation between PH and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$119.88B
TMUS:
$211.72B
PH:
$27.15
TMUS:
$9.45
PH:
35.02
TMUS:
20.70
PH:
1.48
TMUS:
0.31
PH:
5.81
TMUS:
2.41
PH:
7.82
TMUS:
3.86
PH:
$20.99B
TMUS:
$90.53B
PH:
$7.81B
TMUS:
$34.92B
PH:
$5.31B
TMUS:
$28.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
PH
TMUS
PH vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.94 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.36 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | -0.62 | +5.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -86.29% | +19.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -34.02% | +14.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -37.13% | +10.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -37.13% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -37.13% | -17.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -26.67% | +19.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -25.98% | +10.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 19.82% | -13.02% |
Volatility
PH vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 6.33%, while T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 10.23% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.36% | 20.95% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.42% | 26.25% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.61% | 24.30% | +4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.61% | 26.17% | +5.44% |
Dividends
PH vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than TMUS's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.78% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.01% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PH vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. TMUS - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
TMUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
TMUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
TMUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and TMUS have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to PH (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs TMUS's -86.29%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer