PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PH vs. SBGSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PH vs. SBGSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Schneider Electric SA (SBGSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly lower than SBGSY's 17.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed SBGSY with an annualized return of 27.63%, while SBGSY has yielded a comparatively lower 21.80% annualized return.


PH

1D
3.00%
1M
14.04%
YTD
13.09%
6M
11.97%
1Y
48.26%
3Y*
39.63%
5Y*
28.47%
10Y*
27.63%

SBGSY

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
17.22%
6M
16.31%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
21.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PH vs. SBGSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
13.09%39.54%39.58%60.81%-6.91%18.30%34.78%40.75%-24.00%44.91%
SBGSY
Schneider Electric SA
17.22%11.96%25.23%46.80%-27.00%38.04%46.46%55.68%-17.99%25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PH and SBGSY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2008

0.51

The correlation between PH and SBGSY shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PH:

$126.71B

SBGSY:

$180.63B

EPS

PH:

$27.11

SBGSY:

€2.97

PE Ratio

PH:

36.52

SBGSY:

18.79

PEG Ratio

PH:

1.54

SBGSY:

2.81

PS Ratio

PH:

6.06

SBGSY:

2.02

PB Ratio

PH:

8.14

SBGSY:

6.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

PH:

$20.99B

SBGSY:

€78.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PH:

$7.81B

SBGSY:

€32.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

PH:

$5.31B

SBGSY:

€15.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PH vs. SBGSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PH
PH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SBGSY
SBGSY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SBGSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBGSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBGSY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SBGSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBGSY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PH vs. SBGSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Schneider Electric SA (SBGSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHSBGSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

1.37

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

3.64

+3.66

PH vs. SBGSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PH Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the SBGSY Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PH and SBGSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PH vs. SBGSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than SBGSY's maximum drawdown of -47.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and SBGSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSBGSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.92%

-47.64%

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-20.86%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.79%

-28.61%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.64%

-45.04%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.68%

-45.04%

-9.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-5.24%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.32%

-14.16%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

7.83%

-1.20%

Volatility

PH vs. SBGSY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 8.15%, while Schneider Electric SA (SBGSY) has a volatility of 14.81%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBGSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSBGSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

14.81%

-6.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.29%

28.19%

-8.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.24%

35.02%

-9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.66%

32.05%

-3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.66%

30.17%

+1.49%

Dividends

PH vs. SBGSY - Dividend Comparison

PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than SBGSY's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
0.75%0.80%1.00%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%
SBGSY
Schneider Electric SA
1.56%1.05%1.52%1.73%2.18%1.56%1.91%2.59%3.64%2.32%2.93%1.06%

Financials

PH vs. SBGSY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Schneider Electric SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
5.49B
20.82B
(PH) Total Revenue
(SBGSY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PH values in USD, SBGSY values in EUR

PH vs. SBGSY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Schneider Electric SA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
39.4%
Portfolio components
PH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

SBGSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schneider Electric SA reported a gross profit of 8.21B and revenue of 20.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

PH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

SBGSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schneider Electric SA reported an operating income of 3.15B and revenue of 20.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

PH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

SBGSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schneider Electric SA reported a net income of 2.25B and revenue of 20.82B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PH and SBGSY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBGSY has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to PH (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs SBGSY's -47.64%.

PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PH and SBGSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer