PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PH vs. MO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PH vs. MO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 22.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed MO with an annualized return of 25.97%, while MO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.21% annualized return.


PH

1D
1.43%
1M
1.32%
6M
4.78%
YTD
11.56%
1Y
34.58%
3Y*
34.53%
5Y*
27.26%
10Y*
25.97%
ALL TIME*
14.99%

MO

1D
0.57%
1M
-4.49%
6M
13.75%
YTD
22.29%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
23.87%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
7.21%
ALL TIME*
17.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$637.73M$559.86M$594.92M
$537.51M$523.59M$635.17M

PH vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
11.56%39.54%39.58%60.81%-6.91%18.30%34.78%40.75%-24.00%44.91%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
22.29%18.17%40.76%-3.70%4.37%24.18%-10.21%7.87%-27.14%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PH and MO is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.24

The correlation between PH and MO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PH:

$123.13B

MO:

$114.07B

EPS

PH:

$27.15

MO:

$4.76

PE Ratio

PH:

35.96

MO:

14.37

PEG Ratio

PH:

1.52

MO:

0.31

PS Ratio

PH:

5.96

MO:

5.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

PH:

$20.99B

MO:

$21.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PH:

$7.81B

MO:

$15.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

PH:

$5.31B

MO:

$11.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PH vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PH
PH Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MO
MO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PH vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.09

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

2.71

+2.36

PH vs. MO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PH Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the MO Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PH and MO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PH vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, roughly equal to the maximum MO drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and MO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.92%

-65.43%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-16.40%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.79%

-16.40%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.64%

-25.83%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.68%

-53.69%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-8.80%

+4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.30%

-11.90%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.85%

6.59%

+0.26%

Volatility

PH vs. MO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 6.43%, while Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

12.13%

-5.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.46%

20.12%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.70%

24.97%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.66%

21.27%

+7.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.62%

23.29%

+8.33%

Dividends

PH vs. MO - Dividend Comparison

PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than MO's 6.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
6.21%7.21%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
0.76%0.80%1.00%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%

Financials

PH vs. MO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PH vs. MO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Altria Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

MO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.58B and revenue of 6.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

PH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

MO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.14B and revenue of 6.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

PH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

MO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 6.11B, resulting in a net margin of 37.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PH and MO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MO has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to PH (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs MO's -65.43%.

PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PH and MO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer