PGZ vs. UTG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PGZ (Principal Real Estate Income Fund) and UTG (Reaves Utility Income Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, PGZ returned 4.48%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for UTG. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

PGZ vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Real Estate Income Fund (PGZ) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGZ achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly higher than UTG's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PGZ has underperformed UTG with an annualized return of 4.48%, while UTG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.43% annualized return.

PGZ

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 7.86%
• YTD: 9.73%
• 1Y: 11.77%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: 3.28%
• 10Y*: 4.48%
• ALL TIME*: 4.67%

UTG

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -2.98%
• 6M: 4.86%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 1Y: 7.03%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 9.43%
• ALL TIME*: 10.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PGZ Principal Real Estate Income Fund	$196.91K	$199.33K	$211.80K
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust	$12.10M	$10.96M	$10.49M

PGZ vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PGZ Principal Real Estate Income Fund	9.73%	14.50%	17.99%	4.05%	-27.98%	38.70%	-36.50%	36.77%	3.92%	18.23%
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust	8.27%	23.24%	28.10%	2.84%	-13.38%	14.26%	-5.25%	33.65%	1.84%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PGZ and UTG is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.36

The correlation between PGZ and UTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PGZ : $68.41M UTG : $3.52B
EPS PGZ : $2.65 UTG : $22.08
PE Ratio PGZ : 3.85 UTG : 1.74
PEG Ratio PGZ : 0.14 UTG : 0.01
PS Ratio PGZ : 4.26 UTG : 6.58
PB Ratio PGZ : 0.91 UTG : 0.87
Total Revenue (TTM) PGZ : $16.04M UTG : $532.00M
Gross Profit (TTM) PGZ : $13.04M UTG : $478.68M
EBITDA (TTM) PGZ : $21.41M UTG : $2.08B

Return for Risk

PGZ vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGZ

PGZ Risk / Return Rank: 73
PGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
PGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

UTG

UTG Risk / Return Rank: 55
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGZ vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Real Estate Income Fund (PGZ) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PGZ	UTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	0.38	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	0.61	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.08	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	0.54	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.28	1.16	+3.13

PGZ vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGZ and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PGZ vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGZ drawdown since its inception was -53.58%, smaller than the maximum UTG drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGZ and UTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGZ	UTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.58%	-67.77%	+14.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-12.51%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.56%	-14.95%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.34%	-26.54%	-8.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.58%	-47.91%	-5.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.52%	-10.60%	+4.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.03%	-8.72%	-7.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	5.87%	-3.22%

Volatility

PGZ vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Real Estate Income Fund (PGZ) is 3.35%, while Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that PGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGZ	UTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	5.22%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	14.11%	-4.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	18.00%	-7.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.70%	17.17%	-2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	21.70%	+0.10%

Dividends

PGZ vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

PGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.33%, more than UTG's 6.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PGZ Principal Real Estate Income Fund	12.33%	12.59%	12.75%	13.33%	11.86%	6.32%	10.34%	6.25%	7.98%	9.51%	10.90%	10.40%
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust	6.27%	6.42%	7.19%	8.53%	8.07%	6.35%	6.59%	5.69%	6.86%	6.21%	9.02%	6.86%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGZ and UTG in my portfolio?

PGZ and UTG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGZ or UTG?

UTG has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to PGZ (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGZ dropped -53.58% vs UTG's -67.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.