AZMIX vs. CEMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund (AZMIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX).
AZMIX is managed by Allianz. It was launched on Dec 17, 2012. CEMFX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012.
Performance
AZMIX vs. CEMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AZMIX vs. CEMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZMIX Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund | 1.85% | 33.20% | 0.98% | 7.15% | -27.76% | 2.53% | 22.61% | 21.90% | -19.63% | 36.72% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 7.09% | 31.39% | 9.51% | 26.45% | -16.15% | 6.74% | 8.70% | 19.75% | -16.90% | 29.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZMIX achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than CEMFX's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AZMIX has underperformed CEMFX with an annualized return of 6.91%, while CEMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.60% annualized return.
AZMIX
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 28.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.24%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
CEMFX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 38.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AZMIX vs. CEMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AZMIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AZMIX vs. CEMFX — Risk / Return Rank
AZMIX
CEMFX
AZMIX vs. CEMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund (AZMIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZMIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 2.37 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 2.99 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.45 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.99 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | 11.06 | -3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZMIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.37 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.75 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.65 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.46 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between AZMIX and CEMFX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AZMIX vs. CEMFX - Dividend Comparison
AZMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than CEMFX's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZMIX Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund | 3.10% | 3.15% | 1.57% | 1.80% | 2.08% | 0.57% | 1.68% | 2.96% | 3.07% | 1.70% | 2.41% | 3.62% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 2.03% | 1.72% | 3.31% | 4.68% | 1.26% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 4.16% | 2.26% | 3.59% | 3.65% | 4.60% |
Drawdowns
AZMIX vs. CEMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZMIX drawdown since its inception was -44.57%, which is greater than CEMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZMIX and CEMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZMIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.57% | -39.30% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.15% | -12.41% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.05% | -28.13% | -14.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.57% | -39.30% | -5.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -12.16% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.40% | -9.69% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 3.35% | +0.49% |
Volatility
AZMIX vs. CEMFX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund (AZMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) at 6.93%. This indicates that AZMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AZMIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 6.93% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 12.36% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 16.39% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 14.09% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 14.92% | +3.28% |