PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGVFX vs. FIQOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGVFX vs. FIQOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGVFX achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly lower than FIQOX's 24.23% return.


PGVFX

1D
0.67%
1M
2.47%
YTD
21.22%
6M
21.44%
1Y
40.62%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
11.80%

FIQOX

1D
0.35%
1M
6.11%
YTD
24.23%
6M
23.22%
1Y
42.77%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGVFX vs. FIQOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
21.22%27.01%5.33%14.76%-12.00%15.38%6.65%22.83%-10.18%
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
24.23%16.27%46.05%25.10%-25.64%18.58%31.08%29.13%-10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PGVFX and FIQOX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between PGVFX and FIQOX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGVFX vs. FIQOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGVFX
PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQOX
FIQOX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FIQOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGVFX vs. FIQOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGVFXFIQOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.42

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

3.75

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.84

15.90

+0.94

PGVFX vs. FIQOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGVFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the FIQOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGVFX and FIQOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGVFX vs. FIQOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGVFX drawdown since its inception was -68.09%, which is greater than FIQOX's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGVFX and FIQOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGVFXFIQOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.09%

-33.64%

-34.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-11.74%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.53%

-22.59%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-33.64%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-7.81%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.76%

-0.33%

Volatility

PGVFX vs. FIQOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) is 4.22%, while Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that PGVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGVFXFIQOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

7.74%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

15.12%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

18.68%

-6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

20.26%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

21.26%

-5.40%

PGVFX vs. FIQOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGVFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQOX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGVFX vs. FIQOX - Dividend Comparison

PGVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than FIQOX's 9.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
9.34%11.60%26.02%1.10%6.51%12.99%8.23%5.09%9.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
4.27%5.17%5.65%1.68%3.55%4.05%1.55%3.69%3.39%1.50%1.32%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGVFX and FIQOX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQOX has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to PGVFX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGVFX dropped -68.09% vs FIQOX's -33.64%.

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGVFX and FIQOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer