PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGVFX vs. AGLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGVFX vs. AGLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and Ariel Global Fund (AGLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGVFX achieves a 21.30% return, which is significantly lower than AGLOX's 25.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PGVFX has outperformed AGLOX with an annualized return of 12.19%, while AGLOX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.15% annualized return.


PGVFX

1D
1.44%
1M
1.57%
YTD
21.30%
6M
21.01%
1Y
37.62%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
12.19%

AGLOX

1D
1.65%
1M
2.43%
YTD
25.91%
6M
25.27%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGVFX vs. AGLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
21.30%27.01%5.33%14.76%-12.00%15.38%6.65%22.83%-12.64%20.60%
AGLOX
Ariel Global Fund
25.91%23.22%6.55%12.40%-5.47%11.53%7.70%15.98%-6.03%15.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PGVFX and AGLOX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.80

The correlation between PGVFX and AGLOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGVFX vs. AGLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGVFX
PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AGLOX
AGLOX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AGLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AGLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGVFX vs. AGLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and Ariel Global Fund (AGLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGVFXAGLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.53

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

3.62

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.14

13.48

+2.66

PGVFX vs. AGLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGVFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is comparable to the AGLOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGVFX and AGLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGVFX vs. AGLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGVFX drawdown since its inception was -68.09%, which is greater than AGLOX's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGVFX and AGLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGVFXAGLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.09%

-24.72%

-43.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-10.66%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.53%

-12.94%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-16.77%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.26%

-24.72%

-16.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.63%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-3.37%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.86%

-0.43%

Volatility

PGVFX vs. AGLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) is 4.83%, while Ariel Global Fund (AGLOX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that PGVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGVFXAGLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

6.32%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

12.10%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

14.09%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

12.93%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

13.20%

+2.52%

PGVFX vs. AGLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGVFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AGLOX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGVFX vs. AGLOX - Dividend Comparison

PGVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than AGLOX's 13.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGLOX
Ariel Global Fund
13.01%16.38%27.80%18.51%4.82%2.00%0.85%4.39%3.42%4.48%2.65%0.81%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
4.26%5.17%5.65%1.68%3.55%4.05%1.55%3.69%3.39%1.50%1.32%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGVFX and AGLOX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGLOX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to PGVFX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGVFX dropped -68.09% vs AGLOX's -24.72%.

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGVFX and AGLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer