PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGTYX vs. SCMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGTYX vs. SCMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGTYX achieves a 33.39% return, which is significantly lower than SCMIX's 53.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTYX has underperformed SCMIX with an annualized return of 24.90%, while SCMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.75% annualized return.


PGTYX

1D
0.47%
1M
0.08%
6M
29.71%
YTD
33.39%
1Y
49.70%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
16.88%
10Y*
24.90%

SCMIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.66%
6M
39.67%
YTD
53.05%
1Y
98.80%
3Y*
43.63%
5Y*
25.02%
10Y*
27.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGTYX vs. SCMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGTYX
Putnam Global Technology Fund
33.39%23.31%27.88%53.82%-32.30%11.72%70.92%47.50%-6.72%47.05%
SCMIX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class
53.05%37.73%27.06%44.68%-30.96%39.37%44.85%54.60%-7.81%34.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PGTYX and SCMIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2008

0.88

The correlation between PGTYX and SCMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGTYX vs. SCMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGTYX
PGTYX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PGTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SCMIX
SCMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGTYX vs. SCMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGTYXSCMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.51

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

8.05

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

28.63

-18.64

PGTYX vs. SCMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGTYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the SCMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGTYX and SCMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGTYX vs. SCMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGTYX drawdown since its inception was -42.09%, smaller than the maximum SCMIX drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTYX and SCMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGTYXSCMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.09%

-50.85%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.58%

-12.32%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.36%

-29.08%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.09%

-37.18%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-37.18%

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

-4.00%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-9.39%

+2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

3.44%

+1.48%

Volatility

PGTYX vs. SCMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) is 10.83%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX) has a volatility of 12.46%. This indicates that PGTYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGTYXSCMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.83%

12.46%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.67%

22.37%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.27%

28.54%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.59%

26.73%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.37%

26.27%

-1.90%

PGTYX vs. SCMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGTYX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than SCMIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGTYX vs. SCMIX - Dividend Comparison

PGTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than SCMIX's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGTYX
Putnam Global Technology Fund
8.12%10.83%6.40%0.57%1.71%21.15%13.60%2.63%9.44%6.75%1.01%4.56%
SCMIX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class
5.18%7.93%12.11%4.52%8.08%10.45%9.38%10.47%11.30%10.48%7.88%10.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGTYX and SCMIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCMIX has higher volatility (12.46%) compared to PGTYX (10.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGTYX dropped -42.09% vs SCMIX's -50.85%.

SCMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGTYX and SCMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer