PGSGX vs. CMCIX
PGSGX (JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, PGSGX returned 37.88% vs 0.07% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGSGX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
PGSGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGSGX achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 1.72% return.
PGSGX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 37.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
CMCIX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 0.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGSGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PGSGX JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund | 19.85% | 6.21% | 12.45% | 7.67% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 1.72% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGSGX and CMCIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PGSGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGSGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
PGSGX
CMCIX
PGSGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund (PGSGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | -0.02 | +1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 0.08 | +2.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.01 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | -0.04 | +2.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | -0.09 | +9.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | -0.02 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.32 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
PGSGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGSGX drawdown since its inception was -60.90%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGSGX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.90% | -21.50% | -39.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.33% | -11.68% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.61% | -10.79% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -6.44% | -7.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 4.98% | -1.05% |
Volatility
PGSGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund (PGSGX) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.89%. This indicates that PGSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 3.89% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.90% | 10.55% | +6.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 15.16% | +6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 16.55% | +9.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 16.55% | +8.85% |
PGSGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGSGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGSGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
PGSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than CMCIX's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.18% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGSGX JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.17% | 7.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.48% | 15.83% | 7.15% | 6.21% | 14.97% | 8.27% | 3.72% | 8.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGSGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGSGX has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to CMCIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGSGX dropped -60.90% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
PGSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGSGX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer