PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGRTX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGRTX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal SmallCap Growth Fund I (PGRTX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGRTX achieves a 24.59% return, which is significantly higher than FECGX's 20.77% return.


PGRTX

1D
2.85%
1M
6.05%
YTD
24.59%
6M
20.43%
1Y
44.52%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
14.44%

FECGX

1D
2.56%
1M
4.70%
YTD
20.77%
6M
16.62%
1Y
41.84%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGRTX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PGRTX
Principal SmallCap Growth Fund I
24.59%12.87%22.98%16.43%-28.55%7.02%42.08%2.15%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
20.77%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PGRTX and FECGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.96

The correlation between PGRTX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGRTX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGRTX
PGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGRTX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SmallCap Growth Fund I (PGRTX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGRTXFECGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.82

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.86

10.12

+2.74

PGRTX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGRTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGRTX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGRTX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGRTX drawdown since its inception was -60.60%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRTX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGRTXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.60%

-41.85%

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-14.81%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-28.45%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.51%

-40.34%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.51%

-15.66%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

4.13%

-0.69%

Volatility

PGRTX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

Principal SmallCap Growth Fund I (PGRTX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) have volatilities of 8.31% and 7.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGRTXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

7.99%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.69%

16.84%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.53%

22.17%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

24.70%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

27.22%

-4.08%

PGRTX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRTX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGRTX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

PGRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than FECGX's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.45%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGRTX
Principal SmallCap Growth Fund I
7.38%9.19%15.56%0.00%0.82%14.35%4.82%7.50%21.37%5.99%3.05%9.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PGRTX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PGRTX has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to FECGX (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRTX dropped -60.60% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

PGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGRTX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer