PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGOYX vs. PGTYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGOYX vs. PGTYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGOYX achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than PGTYX's 41.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PGOYX has underperformed PGTYX with an annualized return of 18.70%, while PGTYX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.00% annualized return.


PGOYX

1D
-1.07%
1M
5.41%
YTD
8.46%
6M
7.92%
1Y
24.09%
3Y*
24.05%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
18.70%

PGTYX

1D
-1.62%
1M
20.06%
YTD
41.96%
6M
41.14%
1Y
71.88%
3Y*
36.94%
5Y*
19.69%
10Y*
26.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGOYX vs. PGTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGOYX
Putnam Large Cap Growth Y
8.46%14.56%33.58%44.57%-30.25%22.95%38.79%36.76%2.58%31.29%
PGTYX
Putnam Global Technology Fund
41.96%23.31%27.88%53.82%-32.30%11.72%70.92%47.50%-6.72%47.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PGOYX and PGTYX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2008

0.92

The correlation between PGOYX and PGTYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGOYX vs. PGTYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGOYX
PGOYX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PGOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PGOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PGTYX
PGTYX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PGTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGOYX vs. PGTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGOYXPGTYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.54

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

5.45

-3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

17.39

-12.30

PGOYX vs. PGTYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGOYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the PGTYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGOYX and PGTYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGOYXPGTYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

3.35

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.79

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

1.08

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.96

-0.61

Drawdowns

PGOYX vs. PGTYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGOYX drawdown since its inception was -76.03%, which is greater than PGTYX's maximum drawdown of -42.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGOYX and PGTYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGOYXPGTYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.03%

-42.09%

-33.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

-13.58%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.63%

-28.36%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.01%

-42.09%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

-42.09%

+8.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-1.62%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-6.61%

-24.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

4.25%

+0.63%

Volatility

PGOYX vs. PGTYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX) is 3.90%, while Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that PGOYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGTYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGOYXPGTYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

8.13%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

17.83%

-5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

22.13%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

24.99%

-3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

24.12%

-2.91%

PGOYX vs. PGTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGOYX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PGTYX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGOYX vs. PGTYX - Dividend Comparison

PGOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than PGTYX's 7.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGOYX
Putnam Large Cap Growth Y
4.83%5.23%4.25%0.46%7.30%8.55%3.12%3.65%7.92%2.05%0.02%5.78%
PGTYX
Putnam Global Technology Fund
7.63%10.83%6.40%0.57%1.71%21.15%13.60%2.63%9.44%6.75%1.01%4.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PGOYX and PGTYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PGTYX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to PGOYX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGOYX dropped -76.03% vs PGTYX's -42.09%.

PGTYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGOYX and PGTYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer