PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGNAX vs. PHYQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGNAX vs. PHYQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGNAX achieves a 24.54% return, which is significantly higher than PHYQX's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PGNAX has outperformed PHYQX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while PHYQX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.85% annualized return.


PGNAX

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.01%
YTD
24.54%
6M
26.80%
1Y
61.09%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
16.06%
10Y*
11.57%

PHYQX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.64%
6M
2.14%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
5.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGNAX vs. PHYQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
24.54%38.58%0.80%-2.22%24.40%27.22%11.22%16.50%-27.87%4.99%
PHYQX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6
1.64%9.18%8.55%12.34%-12.22%5.99%5.79%16.29%-1.18%7.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PGNAX and PHYQX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGNAX vs. PHYQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGNAX
PGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYQX
PHYQX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHYQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGNAX vs. PHYQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGNAXPHYQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.53

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

3.06

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.46

13.70

+6.76

PGNAX vs. PHYQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the PHYQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGNAX and PHYQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGNAXPHYQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.11

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.80

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

1.07

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.14

-0.78

Drawdowns

PGNAX vs. PHYQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGNAX drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, which is greater than PHYQX's maximum drawdown of -21.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNAX and PHYQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGNAXPHYQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.46%

-21.12%

-55.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-2.47%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.21%

-3.76%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-16.05%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.86%

-21.12%

-42.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-0.42%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.22%

-2.23%

-17.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

0.55%

+2.39%

Volatility

PGNAX vs. PHYQX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) at 1.24%. This indicates that PGNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGNAXPHYQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

1.24%

+4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

2.83%

+14.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

3.59%

+17.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.26%

5.11%

+20.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.42%

5.49%

+20.93%

PGNAX vs. PHYQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGNAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYQX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGNAX vs. PHYQX - Dividend Comparison

PGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than PHYQX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
0.77%0.96%0.98%1.93%2.75%0.84%1.32%1.78%1.59%0.00%1.15%0.00%
PHYQX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6
7.11%7.07%7.53%7.09%6.29%6.23%6.56%6.32%6.64%6.38%4.88%7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGNAX and PHYQX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGNAX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to PHYQX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGNAX dropped -76.46% vs PHYQX's -21.12%.

PGNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGNAX and PHYQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer