PGNAX vs. PDBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX).
PGNAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 21, 1990. PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997.
Performance
PGNAX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGNAX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGNAX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund | 18.84% | 38.58% | 0.80% | -2.22% | 24.40% | 27.22% | 11.22% | 16.50% | -27.87% | 4.99% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.28% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGNAX achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PGNAX has outperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 12.39%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.95% annualized return.
PGNAX
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- 18.84%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 61.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGNAX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGNAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGNAX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
PGNAX
PDBZX
PGNAX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGNAX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 0.99 | +1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 1.41 | +1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.18 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 1.63 | +2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.74 | 4.74 | +13.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGNAX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 0.99 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.16 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.09 | -0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGNAX and PDBZX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PGNAX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
PGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than PDBZX's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGNAX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund | 0.81% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.93% | 2.75% | 0.84% | 1.32% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.18% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
PGNAX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGNAX drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNAX and PDBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGNAX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.46% | -20.88% | -55.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.76% | -3.06% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -20.81% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.86% | -20.88% | -42.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | -2.27% | -3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.31% | -2.31% | -18.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 1.06% | +2.48% |
Volatility
PGNAX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 1.71%. This indicates that PGNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGNAX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 1.71% | +6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.50% | 2.71% | +15.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 4.59% | +20.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 6.00% | +19.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.55% | 5.34% | +21.21% |