PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGNAX vs. MLXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGNAX vs. MLXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGNAX achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly lower than MLXIX's 36.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PGNAX has underperformed MLXIX with an annualized return of 9.94%, while MLXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.


PGNAX

1D
1.44%
1M
-5.19%
6M
4.06%
YTD
13.74%
1Y
42.11%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
9.94%

MLXIX

1D
0.25%
1M
6.20%
6M
32.62%
YTD
36.11%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
22.14%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGNAX vs. MLXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
13.74%38.58%0.80%-2.22%24.40%27.22%11.22%16.50%-27.87%4.99%
MLXIX
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund
36.11%-8.56%45.26%15.34%27.02%42.04%-20.02%12.05%-18.48%-13.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PGNAX and MLXIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2014

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between PGNAX and MLXIX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGNAX vs. MLXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGNAX
PGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MLXIX
MLXIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MLXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MLXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGNAX vs. MLXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGNAXMLXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.17

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.32

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

2.51

+7.15

PGNAX vs. MLXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the MLXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGNAX and MLXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGNAX vs. MLXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGNAX drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, roughly equal to the maximum MLXIX drawdown of -76.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNAX and MLXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGNAXMLXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.46%

-76.78%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-15.44%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.21%

-22.14%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-22.14%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.86%

-72.63%

+8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.05%

-2.44%

-7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-23.03%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

8.12%

-3.88%

Volatility

PGNAX vs. MLXIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) is 5.69%, while Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that PGNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGNAXMLXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

7.27%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

16.89%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

20.43%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.36%

22.52%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.41%

28.08%

-1.67%

PGNAX vs. MLXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGNAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than MLXIX's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGNAX vs. MLXIX - Dividend Comparison

PGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than MLXIX's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLXIX
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund
6.59%8.26%5.02%6.67%7.15%8.26%14.52%15.93%15.62%11.37%8.76%11.47%
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
0.84%0.96%0.98%1.93%2.75%0.84%1.32%1.78%1.59%0.00%1.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGNAX and MLXIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLXIX has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to PGNAX (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGNAX dropped -76.46% vs MLXIX's -76.78%.

PGNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGNAX and MLXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer