PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGKZX vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGKZX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Technology Fund (PGKZX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGKZX achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 34.34% return.


PGKZX

1D
-1.53%
1M
12.79%
YTD
24.27%
6M
22.41%
1Y
44.94%
3Y*
35.24%
5Y*
19.67%
10Y*

XLK

1D
-1.56%
1M
16.63%
YTD
34.34%
6M
33.10%
1Y
64.08%
3Y*
33.46%
5Y*
23.44%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGKZX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PGKZX
PGIM Jennison Technology Fund
24.27%16.93%43.15%65.78%-38.60%15.27%64.06%33.96%-8.52%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
34.34%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-12.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PGKZX and XLK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2018

0.93

The correlation between PGKZX and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGKZX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGKZX
PGKZX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PGKZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGKZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGKZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PGKZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGKZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGKZX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Technology Fund (PGKZX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGKZXXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.49

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

4.04

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

13.55

-4.98

PGKZX vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGKZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGKZX and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGKZXXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

3.09

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.95

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.41

+0.37

Drawdowns

PGKZX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGKZX drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGKZX and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGKZXXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-82.05%

+33.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-15.92%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

-25.66%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.47%

-33.56%

-14.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-2.54%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.38%

-34.95%

+23.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

4.74%

+0.60%

Volatility

PGKZX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Technology Fund (PGKZX) is 6.06%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that PGKZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGKZXXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

7.27%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

16.76%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.08%

20.86%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.06%

24.90%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.34%

24.49%

+3.85%

PGKZX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGKZX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGKZX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

PGKZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than XLK's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGKZX
PGIM Jennison Technology Fund
4.39%5.45%7.67%0.00%0.00%9.73%4.41%0.04%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.40%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PGKZX and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLK has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to PGKZX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGKZX dropped -48.47% vs XLK's -82.05%.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGKZX and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer