PGJZX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
PGJZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 24, 2013. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
PGJZX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGJZX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.87% | 18.41% | 17.13% | 5.85% | -7.82% | 15.06% | 1.98% | 28.89% | -8.57% | 18.81% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 9.43% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGJZX achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 9.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PGJZX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
PGJZX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.87%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGJZX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGJZX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGJZX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
PGJZX
CSUIX
PGJZX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGJZX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 1.71 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.27 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.50 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | 10.88 | +1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGJZX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.71 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.65 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.53 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGJZX and CSUIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGJZX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
PGJZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, less than CSUIX's 7.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.60% | 7.18% | 9.95% | 1.59% | 3.30% | 7.77% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 2.13% | 1.35% | 1.71% | 1.42% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.69% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
PGJZX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGJZX drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJZX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGJZX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.64% | -52.01% | +15.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -7.99% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.56% | -20.01% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.64% | -35.01% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.13% | -3.49% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -8.21% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.84% | +0.07% |
Volatility
PGJZX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.43%. This indicates that PGJZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGJZX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 3.43% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 6.90% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 11.49% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 12.87% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 14.88% | +0.85% |